I wouldn't say that the difference is in what the licenses provide to "developers", because --- although I *don't want to* sound offensive --- thinking about the "developers" here is a little too much, it's like the "how I'll feed my children". :)
So, as far as I understand it: copyleft and so [AL]*GPL licenses, have goals to try to ensure the four essential freedoms to the end users (no matter if these are developers or not), and to do that they have to limit some aspects of what the proprietor can do. So the comparison perhaps must be done starting from a defensive position (from the end user's side) to a liberalist one (to the side of the developer), and not the other way around. -- - [[https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno]] - Palestrante e consultor sobre /software/ livre (não confundir com gratis). - "WhatsApp"? Ele não é livre, por isso não uso. Iguais a ele prefiro GNU Ring, ou Tox. Quer outras formas de contato? Adicione o vCard que está no endereço acima aos teus contatos. - Pretende me enviar arquivos .doc, .ppt, .cdr, ou .mp3? OK, eu aceito, mas não repasso. Entrego apenas em formatos favoráveis ao /software/ livre. Favor entrar em contato em caso de dúvida. _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
