On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:39:13PM -0300, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: > LGPL is copyleft, but the copyleft "preservation" part is required > mainly when the user makes changes to the original (LGPL'd) work > *itself*, this is why it's a weak copyleft license, while a simple > dependency on the LGPL'd work wouldn't need to carry the same or > compatible license (unless if statically linked, if I'm not mistaken).
And for statically linked applications, the LGPLv3 provides the 4d0 option. https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#LGPLStaticVsDynamic
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
