On 09/19/2017 11:08 AM, Lyberta wrote: > Given how quickly SaaSS is taking over the world, should we start > recommending releasing software under AGPL by default? Even if you wrote > a simple thing intended to be run locally, someone may put it on the > server, make SaaSS with it and then add private modifications. >
In principle, yes. In practice, license-compatibility should be emphasized, so software that might be of interest to existing projects that aren't going to release under AGPL, there are times that weaker more-compatible licenses make sense. But I agree fully with: AGPLv3+ as default and urge all software to use AGPLv3-compatible licenses (i.e. GPLv3 compatible). Sometimes that could mean BSD-3 or Apache v2 or GPLv2+, when fitting into an existing ecosystem. My 2¢
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
