* Quiliro Ordóñez <[email protected]> [2021-03-27 20:40]: > I see there is a great effort to make a small group of people remove > the work of just one person.
Look, that is irreversible. Free software philosophy is practically immortal for all of our generations of today. It will survive all of us now. Like who is born today as of 2021-03-29, it will survive that person. GNU as Free Software operating system will survive as well. New systems will be created and more of free software executed. Society has already got a drive to liberate users and give them control over their data, we can see that in US implementation of free software in government, we can see that in European implementations of free software in governments and laws enacted to respect users' data. This will move over to other countries which more or less follow those Western countries in their development. It is up to us now to decide to promote more freedom and free software to liberate people in future. Current problems are in my opinion proprietary software in medicine and proprietary medicine, this may not seem software related, but I think it is very much software related, as they make vaccines with software and impose functionality of a vaccine in human body, it is like nano technology that changes according to how germs attack the body. At least it is so explained. So it is like a program in human body, even if that is program biologically programmed, it is programmed -- and we have no control to know exactly HOW, neither to MODIFY it, neither to distribute it to benefit others (if there is a true benefit), neither we have control to VERIFY if there is any benefit. That is currently important issue for next 100-1000 years on this planet, as large corporation will want to take over our behavior by all means. That is the future and present time problem. > What that one person does must be very important for someone to try > to stop it. That is right, but instead of putting focus on negativity we rather put focus on FSF campaigns. > I wonder if most of RMS opposers are against the greater part of his > work and in favour of the smaller portion of his work. I do not believe that majority of those people are opposers. I will meet some of them and talk to them, we will see. They sign those letters out of good faith mostly, apart from those few who are really opposers. We have to recognize the fact that some good part of population will simple move to direction where the wind blows. They may be good people. Let us recognize that good people have signed the opposing letter. They do not have bad intention. Just few of them are really negative people who spread rumours and lies and incite others to join. -- Jean Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns: https://www.fsf.org/campaigns _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
