With the GPL, isn't the requirement of copying or modifying and then passing on, that the license is preserved and a copy of the license is included with the new version. This can be done by including text in the program (I guess like Geany does) and provide a link back to the appropriate license on the gnu.org site.
Paul On 25/05/2026 10:57 pm, Andy Tai wrote:
The US Copyright Office declared that LLM output is non-copyrightable.
Is LLM output public domain? Then incorporating LLM output into
copylefted program seems safe, as such output is GPL'd.
But there seems to be fear that if much of a program is output from LLM
(say via gradual patch incorporation or third-party contribution), then
the copyright of the whole program—GPL or some other license—may no
longer apply,
I'm curious if such fear is justified.
_______________________________________________
libreplanet-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
-- Paul Sutton, Cert Cont Sci (Open) https://zleap.net/ OpenPGP : 0F0F CC85 4F58 3258 Mastodon : https://techhub.social/@zleap
OpenPGP_0x0F0FCC854F583258_and_old_rev.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
