Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 14:06:22 +0200
From: "Dave's Libretto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IBM Hard Drive
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Libretto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 48 Meg is, um, 50% larger than the 32 Meg the original poster's laptop had
> in it.
Yes, well he wanted as much as we could find lying around, but the point was it
worked on 32Mb, and it was server, not pro.
> Running Win2K *server* on less than 64 meg of ram is, um, hugely
> sub-optimal...
Running it on less than 128 or more is the same!
The machine did have 128Mb installed, but he needed the cash, and I wanted the
memory =O)
> That your friend could do it, does not mean it is practical as an on-going
> system,
> any use of the machine as *any* kind of non-trivial server would be very
> slow, if
> at all possible.
It was OK for what it was doing, NAT with a firewall and basic file sharing,
although I'e learnt that its not worth the hassle to say anything about it to
him =O)
Cheers
Dave
**************************************************************
http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list
http://libretto.basiclink.com/archive - Archives
http://www.picante.com/~gtaylor/portable/faq.html - FAQ
-------UNSUBSCRIBE-------
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=cmd:unsubscribe
--------UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST------
Use above but add DIGEST to the subject line...
**************************************************************
