Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 17:45:23 +1000 From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [LIB] Ghost O/T
At 01:20 AM 16/09/2004 -0700, you wrote:
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 01:18:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [LIB] Ghost O/T
--- David Chien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > When I create a Ghost Image whats the best option > > for compression? Normal, Fast, and High? > > High = smallest image files, but takes a longer > time. Fast usually works well.
Are the compressed images as stable as non-compressed images? Or might there be any other issues with compression? I never looked into it, and tend not to compress as I've never been sure.
AFAIK the only reason to select one type of compression over the other is the time-space tradeoff (high compression is small but takes longer to compress and decompress for instance). I find that if you corrupt an image file, you're generally in trouble anyway ...
Cheers!
- Raymond
P.S. yes I AM still here, just somewhat snowed under ... hehe
---
/~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\
| | "Does fuzzy logic tickle?" |
| ___ | "My HDD has no reverse. How do I backup?" |
| /__/ +-------------------------------------------|
| / \ a y b o t | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| | Need help? Visit #Windows98 on DALNet! |
| ICQ: 31756092 | Libretto IRC channel #Libretto on DALNet! |
\~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~/
