Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 16:44:04 +0800
From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [LIB] u100 battery life engineering problem -- footnote
*shrug* OK whatever makes you happier ... personally I'd prefer to trust my
textbooks but that's just me :-)
- Raymond
At 11:57 PM 23/12/2005 -0800, you wrote:
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:56:21 -0800 (PST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIB] u100 battery life engineering problem -- footnote
i.e.
I just reread what I wrote and am quite amazed. you guys probably don't
know this but ever since I started studying electronics and mathematics I
have always made the claim that using voltage and zero to solve problems
is false and induces great effiency errors in actual real world problems.
near as I can tell it does -- in the range of up to 70-90% or so. in line
powered equipment this does not matter since, in general, the line power
is unchanging and always there but in battery powered equipment such as
what we use we loose alot of life with errors. so..quit using zero, my
buds!! that will help finding the answer to super conducters!!
:)))))))))))))
john
> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:29:08 -0800 (PST)
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [LIB] u100 battery life engineering problem
>
> hi raymond
>
> first off I know about the high currect discharge pattern of li-poly, it
> is like a baby brother to the lead acid discharge.
<snip>
---
/~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\
| | "Does fuzzy logic tickle?" |
| ___ | "My HDD has no reverse. How do I backup?" |
| /__/ +-------------------------------------------|
| / \ a y b o t | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| | Need help? Visit #Windows98 on DALNet! |
| ICQ: 31756092 | www.raybot.net |
\~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~/
