Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 02:26:57 -0800 (PST) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIB] u100 battery life engineering problem -- footnote
which textbooks are you using? the exsistance of zero is an old theorm which basically says it doesn't. the definition of static follows the theorm. I've always wondered why scientists and engineers cling to zero so much. that really screws up so many formulas. just check out energy and you'll find that claimed limits don't exist. and if you think of natural (non-manmade) elements in this world there really are no zero limits. either they exist or .... nothing. no defined zero simply a border seperating positive and negative elements and we are certainly NOT I repeat NOT using that border in its proper context otherwise we'd be creating anti-electrons which would zap us when they came into contact with the positive electrons we use. Mathematics is barely useable. john > Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 16:44:04 +0800 > From: Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [LIB] u100 battery life engineering problem -- footnote > > *shrug* OK whatever makes you happier ... personally I'd prefer to trust > my > textbooks but that's just me :-) > > - Raymond > > At 11:57 PM 23/12/2005 -0800, you wrote: >>Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:56:21 -0800 (PST) >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: [LIB] u100 battery life engineering problem -- footnote >> >>i.e. >> >>I just reread what I wrote and am quite amazed. you guys probably don't >>know this but ever since I started studying electronics and mathematics I >>have always made the claim that using voltage and zero to solve problems >>is false and induces great effiency errors in actual real world problems. >>near as I can tell it does -- in the range of up to 70-90% or so. in line >>powered equipment this does not matter since, in general, the line power >>is unchanging and always there but in battery powered equipment such as >>what we use we loose alot of life with errors. so..quit using zero, my >>buds!! that will help finding the answer to super conducters!! >>:))))))))))))) >> >>john >> >> > Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:29:08 -0800 (PST) >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Subject: Re: [LIB] u100 battery life engineering problem >> > >> > hi raymond >> > >> > first off I know about the high currect discharge pattern of li-poly, >> it >> > is like a baby brother to the lead acid discharge. > > <snip> > > > --- > > > /~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\ > | | "Does fuzzy logic tickle?" | > | ___ | "My HDD has no reverse. How do I backup?" | > | /__/ +-------------------------------------------| > | / \ a y b o t | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | > | | Need help? Visit #Windows98 on DALNet! | > | ICQ: 31756092 | www.raybot.net | > \~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~/ > > >
