On Thursday, August 02, 2012 06:36:49 PM [email protected] wrote: > From: "Thiago Marcos P. Santos" <[email protected]> > > It is always nice to provide this alternative version of variadic functions > since there is no portable way of wrapping them.
Hmm, this would have been nice last week when I asked for any API changes. It doesn't mean we can't add it, just that the bar is a little bit higher now. I understand the basic why, but can you provide a concrete example of an application which needs this functionality? I'm also not sure about the new function names, I would like to keep the API "namespaced" with the "seccomp_" prefix ... maybe tack a "_va" on the end instead? -- paul moore security and virtualization @ redhat ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ libseccomp-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libseccomp-discuss
