On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> wrote: > FWIW, it appears that the return value of > seccomp_syscall_resolve_name_arch on error doesn't match the docs in > seccomp.h. I won't fix that one.
Ah, good catch. I assume you're talking about the -EINVAL/-EFAULT return cases? -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ libseccomp-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libseccomp-discuss
