On Nov 8, 2013 7:29 PM, "Paul Moore" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
wrote:
> > FWIW, it appears that the return value of
> > seccomp_syscall_resolve_name_arch on error doesn't match the docs in
> > seccomp.h. I won't fix that one.
>
> Ah, good catch. I assume you're talking about the -EINVAL/-EFAULT return
cases?
Yes.
>
> --
> paul moore
> www.paul-moore.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers
Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore
techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most
from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
libseccomp-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libseccomp-discuss
