Austin,
Fair enough. I like the way you're handling this. You probably know that I was looking in detail at these problems too for a while, and I just want to say that I like your solutions to them.
On 9/21/06, Austin Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Look at ObjectUpdate though; how well does C# handle calling a
> function with 57 parameters?
Other problems include variable blocks and remembering which
parameters correspond to which fields. It'd work great in a language
with named parameters or record constructors, but not so much in C# :/
_______________________________________________ libsecondlife-dev mailing list libsecondlife-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/libsecondlife-dev http://www.libsecondlife.org/
