On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 12:06 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > just to be clear, what i said about "this is silly" was focusing on > the > size of trackable and derivatives when runtime performance was so > poor
Karl Nelson was quite obsessed with runtime performance (though probably more on signal emission than signal connection, understandably), and runtime memory use. If you can improve it, for some future parallel-installable version of libsigc++, and prove that it's an improvement, you might try to provide a patch. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ libsigc-list mailing list libsigc-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libsigc-list
