On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 21:21 +0200, stephan beal wrote: > > If you can submit a test case I will consider it. I don't think > there > > is any bug, so you have to show that it exists. > > The point is that it's officially, according to the C++ Standard, > *undefined* behaviour.
There is no test case that does something that is both a) undefined behaviour. and b) sensible to do with a the class because you can not use a non-polymorphic class polymorphically. If you do indeed have a test case that does both a) and b), just submit it. Trying to redefine "polymorphic" isn't very helpful. It's quite clearly defined and understood for C++. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ libsigc-list mailing list libsigc-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libsigc-list
