tis 2011-10-18 klockan 08:47 +0200 skrev Daniel Stenberg: > On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Peter Stuge wrote: > > > I am not advocating using numbers in the API, but to have values in an enum > > in libssh2.h, e.g. LIBSSH2_SIGNAL_QUIT. The names should match those in the > > RFC of course. > > I agree completely with this.
Note, the "signal" request is open-ended and allows for other signals to be sent in addition to what is explicitly listed in the RFC. For signals not defined in an SSH RFC the normal <name>@<implementer> style is used, and for OS defined signals <name>@<implementer>.config.guess. Additional well defined signal names may be added in other RFCs. I do not think the API should restrict to only RFC4254 defined signals. Not even sure we should sanity check them. Regards Henrik _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
