> > > Since this list is search linearly, you could make it ever so slightly > faster > > by sorting it in decreasing order or usage frequency. That would be hard > to > > determine, but I'd put signal like QUIT and HUP before ones like FPE. > It's a > > microoptimization, but it comes for free :) > I'd prefer to keep it in the same order as in RFC, doc file and error > string, if you don't mind. >
In fact it might even be better this way. QUIT should only happen once, but ALRM could potentially happen many times so in some situations it could be less optimal to move them earlier than the RFC states. I agree I think it's best to keep the listed order.
_______________________________________________ libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
