On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Steven Dake wrote:
I made this change to stop getting the 82 packets which were causing the
leaks.
I am not in favor of asserting the lib when packet 3 is received. There are
probably many conditions under which the error packet 3 could be received
with different ssh daemons (I am using openssh for the server atm). I'd
prefer it be rejected silently (or given back to the api caller) over an
assertion.
Hey!
I've not really caught up the backs and forths of this discussion. Is there an
outcome or patch suggested or where do we stand on the leak thing?
--
/ daniel.haxx.se
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
