tis 2012-03-06 klockan 06:14 +0100 skrev Peter Stuge: > Henrik Nordström wrote: > > For now we need your patch but with corrected comments and description. > > It's the wrong thing, but much better than doing nothing. > > Hm? I think doing the wrong thing isn't such a good idea?
It is a small step towards a better result. > If we want to assist library users (I do) I think what we could do is > return an error for _keepalive_send() until it's safe to send one. That too, but is unrelated other than attempting to send keep-alive too early before protocol is active triggers the problem. Regards Henrik _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel