Hi! Leif Salomonsson wrote: > I will look into an alternative to using the macros, making a > linklib that encapsulates the macros for example.
Will that work, given that the macros exist in some header file that presumably needs to be included? > > please at the very least use *sane* names > > Sure. How about cb_send() and cb_receive() (cb_= callback). Now > we have actually improved the names because it becomes clear > they are not the same as bsdsocket send() and recv() (different > return values). Yes, this would be an excellent improvement. Would you please send that as a separate patch? > >> - if (session->remote.crypt->crypt(session, source, > >> + if (session->remote.crypt->_crypt_(session, source, > > > Wouldn't you have to change the session->remote.crypt name as well? > > No, GCC is OK with that, likely because "crypt->" is not a function call. I guess it's #define crypt(foo) then, and CPP will only match the word including parenthesis. //Peter _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
