On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Daniel Stenberg wrote: > I think I like this idea. It would also make it clearly which functions that > would work non-blocking since we'd only implement those that truly are...
Ok, let's say I take that approach for functions that currently return pointers and not just return status integers. But what do you think about the functions that a) don't need adjustments (since they already return ints and we can just introduce a new error code meaning EAGAIN - that's what I've done so far) or b) just require a minor change like libssh2_sftp_read() that simply needs to return a signed variable instead of the current size_t ? libssh2_sftp_read() might need attention anyway since it is documented to return -1 on error which is hard to do on unsigned variables, and because the normal read() returns ssize_t and I think this should mimic that. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel mailing list libssh2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libssh2-devel
