On Mon, 22 Dec 2008, Alexander Lamaison wrote:

> Should we have a seek64 function anyway and just keep the seek2 version for 
> backward-compatibility?  My code looks a bit odd setting with seek2 and 
> getting with tell64.  In fact, as seek2 was added after the last release (I 
> think) and therefore isn't really 'official', would it hurt to remove it 
> completely?

Ah right it was never released officially yet. What a relief - thanks for 
pointing that out! I'll rename it to *_seek64().

-- 

  / daniel.haxx.se

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel mailing list
libssh2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libssh2-devel

Reply via email to