Charles Wilson wrote:
> * libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh (func_emit_cwrapperexe_src)
> [ltwrapper_debugprintf]: Renamed to...
> [lt_debugprintf]: this. Only print messages if lt_debug != 0.
> [file scope]: Add constants and variables to support new --lt-debug
> option. Remove LTWRAPPER_DEBUGPRINTF macro.
> [main]: Consolidate option parsing. Ensure first use of lt_debugprintf
> occurs after option parsing. Add stanza to parse for --lt-debug and
> set lt_debug variable.
> [all]: Use lt_debugprintf () instead of LTWRAPPER_DEBUGPRINTF (()).
> * tests/cwrapper.at: Add new tests for --lt-debug and -DLT_DEBUGWRAPPER.
> ---
> Another fragment arising from review of
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2009-06/msg00031.html
> 
> Lightly tested by running "tests/demo-shared.test tests/demo-make.test
> tests/demo-exec.test" and cwrapper.at.
> 
> Ok to push?

Ping?

I'll follow up this patch with another to add "support" for
  --lt-debug
  --lt-dump-script
to the shell wrapper.  --lt-debug will do very little other than $ECHO
the full path to the program executable and its arguments.
--lt-dump-script will simply { cat $0 && exit 0 }

Then I'll revise and retitle the remainder of
[PATCH] Document and test LT_DEBUGWRAPPER cwrapper macro
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2009-06/msg00031.html
as appropriate.

--
Chuck


Reply via email to