Charles Wilson wrote:
> This one, I think is OK for pre-2.2.8 -- what do you guys think?
> OK to push?
I forgot: the mingw libtool distribution includes this patch, but with
the following small change. Obviously I'd merge these two together and
commit as one.
--
Chuck
diff -u a/tests/cwrapper.at b/tests/cwrapper.at
--- a/tests/cwrapper.at 2009-07-12 20:32:35.000000000 -0400
+++ b/tests/cwrapper.at 2009-07-13 04:42:49.391000000 -0400
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
[], [ignore], [ignore])
LT_AT_EXEC_CHECK([./usea], [0], [ignore], [stderr], [--lt-debug])
LT_AT_UNIFY_NL([stderr])
-AT_CHECK([grep '^(main) argv\[[0\]][[ \t]]*: \./usea' stderr], [0], [ignore], [ignore])
+AT_CHECK([grep '^(main) argv\[[0\]][[ \t]]*: .*[[\\/]]usea' stderr], [0], [ignore], [ignore])
# Make sure wrapper debugging works, when activated at compile time.
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@
[], [ignore], [ignore])
LT_AT_EXEC_CHECK([./usea], [0], [ignore], [stderr], [])
LT_AT_UNIFY_NL([stderr])
- AT_CHECK([grep '^(main) argv\[[0\]][[ \t]]*: \./usea' stderr], [0], [ignore], [ignore])
+ AT_CHECK([grep '^(main) argv\[[0\]][[ \t]]*: .*[[\\/]]usea' stderr], [0], [ignore], [ignore])
done
