On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 17:47, Albert Chin wrote: > On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 03:00:27PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 14:51, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > > > > > I'll probably have some free time toward the end of this month, and am > > > volunteering to roll a release of branch-1-5 if nobody has any objections. > > > > > > Would that be 1.5.4 or 1.5.3? > > > > > 1.5.4 :-) > > I'd like to see the following patches in the next 1.5 release: > http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-02/msg00069.html > This one's tied up in a fix to the "preferring .la libraries over earlier non-.la libraries" patch. I'm back on top of things now, so expect the combined patch RSN (I'm trying to get LT_LANG/LT_TAG out of the door atm.)
> http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-02/msg00092.html > This needs a version written for HEAD as well, we shouldn't patch branch-1-5 until HEAD is patched. > http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-02/msg00131.html > http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-03/msg00018.html > These two need checking and applying to HEAD first (are the patches against HEAD?) Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
