On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 06:32:04PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote: > On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 17:47, Albert Chin wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 03:00:27PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > > On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 14:51, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > > > > > > > I'll probably have some free time toward the end of this month, and am > > > > volunteering to roll a release of branch-1-5 if nobody has any objections. > > > > > > > > Would that be 1.5.4 or 1.5.3? > > > > > > > 1.5.4 :-) > > > > I'd like to see the following patches in the next 1.5 release: > > > http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-02/msg00092.html > > > This needs a version written for HEAD as well, we shouldn't patch > branch-1-5 until HEAD is patched.
Done. > > http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-02/msg00131.html > > http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-03/msg00018.html > > These two need checking and applying to HEAD first (are the patches > against HEAD?) Will do now. We never submit patches for HEAD as we don't use it in production. -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
