Hello, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Ludovic Courtès wrote on Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 09:38:53AM CET: >> The Guile project is considering moving from Libtool 1.5 to 2.2. We >> noticed subtle incompatibilities when people tried to compile Guile >> tarballs (which use Libtool 1.5 up to now) with <ltdl.h> from Libtool >> 2.2 [0]. >> >> The question now is: will people be able to build tarballs that come >> with Libtool 2.2 with <ltdl.h> from Libtool 1.5? > >> [0] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel/7876 > > Please describe those limitations, this URL is not accessible here > ATM. See this thread: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2008-11/msg00067.html . > Could be the same as those described here? > <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2008-11/msg00007.html> Like the second problem listed in this message, i.e., the fact that "libtool 2.2 [renames] the symbol table from lt_preloaded_symbols to lt__PROGRAM__LTX_preloaded_symbols." Thanks, Ludo'. _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
