On 7/24/07, David Mosberger-Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I noticed that too. Me thinks it would be safer to remove "long double" and declare fpreg_t only in terms of (known-size) integer types. Arun, what do you think?
We might have to handle > 128 bit SSE (eg: 512 bit SSE) some day. So I actually prefer an interface separate from the fpreg. But if we want to keep things simple for now, here's the status: x86: long double is 96 bit, SSE is 128 bit x86_64: both long double and SSE are 128 bit So we could implement a union like ia64. -Arun PS: http://arstechnica.com/articles/paedia/hardware/clearing-up-the-confusion-over-intels-larrabee.ars
_______________________________________________ Libunwind-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel
