I don't have any objection to adding a pseudo-register for DWARF. Arun, what do you think of this?
--david On 12/3/07, Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > For frysk it is beneficial to get at the Canonical Frame Address from a > cursor (to check during stepping whether we are still in the same > function invocation, opposed to in some recursive invocation). But there > is no architecture independent way to get at it. Since the cfa is kept > in the dwarf cursor would it make sense to expose it explicitly as a > pseudo (read-only) register UNW_REG_CFA you can fetch through > unw_get_reg? (Currently we unwind one step and take the SP and see if it > changed). > > Cheers, > > Mark > > > > _______________________________________________ > Libunwind-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel > -- Mosberger Consulting LLC, http://www.mosberger-consulting.com/ _______________________________________________ Libunwind-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel
