On Jan 8, 2008 6:59 AM, Andrew Cagney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1.98c worth: > > - the "CFA" value is from the frame inner to cursor > can I suggest a name like UNW_REG_INNER_CFA? >
Is there an ambiguity that the longer name helps resolve? - can it be assigned a negative constant value so that it can't polute > the ISA register number space > when extending the x86 register numbers I had to leave a gap in the > middle to ensure "binary" number compatibility, giving these libunwind > "registers" constant -ve values would help avoid that in the future This sounds like a good thing to do. But because we have other libunwind registers (eg: UNW_TDEP_IP) whose values change when new ISA registers are added, this should be a separate patch. -Arun
_______________________________________________ Libunwind-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel
