On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Pete Batard <p...@akeo.ie> wrote:
> Of course, if there's an official fix in libusb that has already gone
> through the investigation/validation process and that I can steal/modify
> to apply to libusbx in a matter of minutes, then if I have a couple of
> minutes to spare (i.e. "nothing better to do"), I may very well try to
> apply it.
>

Now my two simple patches (one warning fix and one NetBSD
experimental support) are inside libusb.git. Would you
consider including them inside libusbx.git?
http://git.libusb.org/?p=libusb.git;a=summary

Peter actually adds OpenBSD/NetBSD in the
libusb-1.0.pc file.

Take note the warning fix is harmless. The NetBSD backend
can be labeled as experimental as OpenBSD.

On the other hand, I will try to get more people to test
the NetBSD platform by going to NetBSD mailing list
and ask for help in testing and improvement.

-- 
Xiaofan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________
libusbx-devel mailing list
libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel

Reply via email to