On 2012.04.23 12:56, Hans de Goede wrote: > Your really showing that you're running out of sane arguments here, > first of all any sane version check to work around bugs will use the > integer field rather then relying on string parsing,
Which only works fine for a project that actually releases. On the other hand, for a project that very much demonstrated that it has no trouble forcing app developers to use the git repo for 2 years, with no possibility to use the version field, the argument isn't that insane. One of the reasons we forked was because new versions of libusb didn't occur... which of course makes it very difficult to compare versions in a libusb based app. And Peter established that he is categorically opposed to RERO, so I don't foresee the 1.0.9 release changing much. Once again, if the majority votes to have the field, I'll go with it. But I hope that doesn't prevent me from trying to indicate why I see it as a bad idea. Regards, /Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
