On 2012.06.17 14:00, Xiaofan Chen wrote: >>> In any case, the modification is benign and will work >>> with different version of dlltool, so I think it is good >>> to change libusb-1.0.def.
I'm still on the fence there. I'd rather wait a few weeks and see if dlltool are going to fix this, as there may exist cases where people will want to rename the DLL in their build process, and thus rely on the expected default. I doubt we're the only project around that uses a bare "LIBRARY" statement, so they probably want to address that issue. If nothing has happened in a couple of weeks, I'll apply the patch. Regards, /Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
