On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 01:06:05 +0100, Pete Batard said: >The one problem I see is, comprehensive unit testing is fine on paper, >when you have the resources. But I seriously see us having a major >constraint in that domain, and right now, I see rigorous comprehensive >unit testing as utterly unrealistic.
But that's not a reason to have *no* unit testing. :) Something would be better than nothing. Again, I propose ctest & cdash. It's easy for community members to submit compilation & test results of all sorts of configurations, as seen here for example: <http://open.cdash.org/index.php?project=CMake> We would contribute nightly builds on 10.5, 10.6, 10.7, 10.8, and Ubuntu 12, using different versions of gcc and clang. Cheers, -- ____________________________________________________________ Sean McBride, B. Eng s...@rogue-research.com Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got visibility? Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like. Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
