I am a newbie of libuv :) . I know mediasoup , it just uses one event loop(default event loop). So should I just use one event loop in my code, and why libuv provides an api to creating uv_loop_t ? The default event loop is enough.
在 2018年10月25日星期四 UTC+8下午7:24:32，Iñaki Baz Castillo写道： > > One event loop per UDP handle? Well, the idea behind an event loop is > not having to create N threads for handling N sockets or file > descriptions. > On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 13:14, Chen Cong <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > > > Thanks for your quick reply. > > > > Actually I implement my own WebRTC ICE stack(I think you know what I > mean :) ), and I create one event loop for each udp handle . Because loop > would block the main thread , I also create one thread for each loop (I > have no idea if I use the loop in the right way). So uv_udp_try_send is > called in the other thread. > > > > 在 2018年10月25日星期四 UTC+8下午6:07:13，Saúl Ibarra Corretgé写道： > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Oct 25, 2018, at 10:10, Chen Cong <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I use libuv to build a high throughput udp server , and I have some > questions about libuv. > >> > > >> > 1. using "uv_udp_send" or "uv_udp_try_send" ? I use > "uv_udp_try_send" now , and it seems that "uv_udp_try_send" is thread-safe. > >> > > >> > >> It’s not. Even if it may coincidentally be, that’s en implementation > detail. All APIs are thread-UNsafe unsafe unless stated otherwise. > >> > >> > 2. if "uv_udp_try_send" is better , how can I use it to send packet ? > I know "uv_udp_try_send" is not thread-safe, and I find a related thread. > I want to know if PC-capable pipe server is still a good way to solve > this situation. > >> > > >> > >> I don’t understand the question. One is not better than the other, they > server different purposes. uv_udp_try_send will not queue data so you can > call it with a stack allocated buffer for example. When using uv_udp_send, > the request needs to “survive” until the callback is called. > >> > >> The typical use case is to try to send the packet with try_send, and if > it doesn’t succeed, send it with the regular send. > >> > >> I don’t understand why you mix threads with these APIs. > >> > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> -- > >> Saúl > >> > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "libuv" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > <javascript:>. > > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/libuv. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > <[email protected] <javascript:>> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "libuv" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/libuv. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
