On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 09:20:49PM -0700, Xiang, Haihao wrote: > > Hi Scott, > > Does your patches change the pass criteria? I don't see any failure > after applying your patches, but Common/JPEGEncodeInputTest.Full/95 > should be failed if no change to pass criteria.
It should not alter the pass-criteria for any test. Looking closer at the change, because the comparison is done with int8_t, it is possible that a surface of all 0 will compare as 'close enough' to a surface of all 255. Let me see if I can fix that. > > Thanks > Haihao > > > > For me these two patches take the Big encode test from 44sec to > > ~7sec. > > > > Scott D Phillips (2): > > test: use valarray for raw image comparison > > test: read jpeg test data from /dev/urandom > > > > test/i965_jpeg_encode_test.cpp | 29 +++++++++++++---------------- > > test/i965_jpeg_test_data.cpp | 6 +++--- > > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > _______________________________________________ Libva mailing list Libva@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libva
