On Sun, 2017-01-01 at 12:35 +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > > No rush, I see Michal has yet another proposal for this that we haven't > > considered and even though there are somedrawbacks to that as well, it > > looks nicer than this. > > > > After all the ideas I'm starting to like the "gross" one the best. Oh > > my =) > > My vote still goes to this solution, because having a placeholder seems > more explicit and easier to follow than doing s/lo/lo0/ directly.
I vote for Michal's approach as it doesn't require us to disable VIR_TEST_REGENERATE_OUTPUT. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
