On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 09:57:04AM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Sun, 2017-01-01 at 12:35 +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> No rush, I see Michal has yet another proposal for this that we haven't
> considered and even though there are somedrawbacks to that as well, it
> looks nicer than this.
> 
> After all the ideas I'm starting to like the "gross" one the best.  Oh
> my =)
 
My vote still goes to this solution, because having a placeholder seems
more explicit and easier to follow than doing s/lo/lo0/ directly.

I vote for Michal's approach as it doesn't require us to
disable VIR_TEST_REGENERATE_OUTPUT.


Well, it does.  Kinda.  You *must not* regenerate output on FreeBSD with
his patch, so it should be explicitly disabled.

I can't make up my mind, currently I'm inclining to your solution with
multiple files, so I'll let you guys decide.

-- 
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to