On 07/14/2011 08:14 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 08:11:20AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >> On 07/14/2011 08:08 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >>>> That would be a valid concern if we passed internal flags over the wire, >>>> but we don't. >>> >>> I'm thinking about the case where a value we currently use for an >>> internal flag, gets used for a public flag in the future. In that >>> case, any client side checks for curent internal flags would be >>> bogus. >> >> Then we already have the bogus situation, where libvirt.c is silently >> filtering out internal flags. > > I wasn't aware of any existing filtering - we must remove any such > cases.
Will do - I already had a local patch started for that effort, but I can improve it along these lines. -- Eric Blake [email protected] +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
