❦ 25 juillet 2016 06:06 CEST, Martin Kletzander <mklet...@redhat.com> :
>>╭─────┤ http://libvirt.org/formatnetwork.html#elementsConnect ├───── >>│Inclusion of the forward element indicates that the virtual network is >>│to be connected to the physical LAN.Since 0.3.0. The mode attribute >>│determines the method of forwarding. If there is no forward element, the >>│network will be isolated from any other network (unless a guest >>│connected to that network is acting as a router, of course). >>╰───── >> >>That's exactly what I want: just a vnet interface, no bridge, no >>routing, no forwarding. However, if I create a network with just that: >> > > "Just a vnet interface, no bridge" means you want no network. Where > should the vnet be connected? The host is able to handle the routing. It seems I could just declare an interface of type "ethernet" instead of "network" to get the effect I want. -- Write clearly - don't be too clever. - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger) _______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
