On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 08:49:23AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
❦ 25 juillet 2016 08:44 CEST, Martin Kletzander <mklet...@redhat.com> :"Just a vnet interface, no bridge" means you want no network. Where should the vnet be connected?The host is able to handle the routing. It seems I could just declare an interface of type "ethernet" instead of "network" to get the effect I want.I'm sorry, but I have no idea what is the end result you are trying to achieve. Could you describe what are your trying to set up without libvirt technicalities?I have a process watching libvirt event to add a route like "ip route add 192.0.2.147/32 dev vnet18" once the VM is spawned. The host is then responsible for any routing to/from the VM. I don't want the VM to be part of a bridge.
OK, yes, then you want just <interface type='X'> where X is one of 'macvtap', 'ethernet', etc., feel free to find the right one here: https://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsNICS
--
Indent to show the logical structure of a program.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ libvirt-users mailing list libvirt-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
