Keary Suska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't wish to complicate issues any, but it seems to me more sensible to > specify the desired separator string as an optional parameter to the URI > constructor. This also avoids the mentioned caveats, as it would otherwise > have to be explicitly changed. I recall there was a question of instance > variables and lack thereof, and having not looked at the module code in > depth I don't know how much work is entailed in using a hash reference > instead of a scalar reference, but IMHO doing so would make the code more > extensible.
I would also make URI objects much more expensive. I don't think it is worth it for ;'s sake. Regards, Gisle
