I want a *caching* version of WWW::Mechanize.

 - No, WWW::Mechanize::Cached does not cut it for me. It does not
   honor any HTTP cache control headers. And, also, I think that
   caching better belongs to the UserAgent. Here it is much more
   reusable anyway.

Patches are certainly welcome. Anything you want to add to it, I'm glad to take a look at. I don't want WWW::Mechanize::Cached to mess with LWP::UserAgent::WithCache, though.



-- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance



Reply via email to