On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:42:43AM +1000, Robert Barta wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 11:07:00PM +0100, Reinier Post wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 08:27:38AM +1000, Robert Barta wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I hope I did not miss an obvious solution to the following: > > > > > > I want a *caching* version of WWW::Mechanize. > > > > Why don't you just use a caching proxy server? Squid? > > First, we need a bit more control on the caching policy. Reconfiguring > a squid remotely is a bit brittle :-) But, more importantly, we cannot > assume that a proxy/cache is at every user site where the agent is > running.
I was assuming you'd put it on the client side. But perhaps Squid won't run there. -- Reinier
