Is it considered acceptable for a subclass of LWP::UserAgent to invent a new phase name, and process handlers for that phase in new and/or overridden methods? If so, are there any naming recommendations that are likely to avoid conflicts with phases added in future versions of LWP::UA? And is the run_handlers method available to subclasses for these purposes (despite not being documented at the moment)?
I'd be happy to submit a documentation patch with the answers to these questions, once I know them. :-) -- Aaron Crane ** http://aaroncrane.co.uk/
