Never liked it much myself. Dan
On Feb 1, 2008, at 16:29, Trans wrote: > I think we may want to change the package name from 'libxml-ruby' to > just 'libxml'. The reason I suggest this is b/c, while it might > suffice as is, it's confusing in light of platform gems. Ie. the "- > ruby" looks like a platform specification. I know other gems use the > "- > ruby" suffix to indicate a pure ruby version of an otherwise compiled > library. > > Thoughts? > T. > _______________________________________________ > libxml-devel mailing list > libxml-devel@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel _______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list libxml-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
