rlibxml? Charlie
Dan Janowski wrote:
Never liked it much myself. Dan On Feb 1, 2008, at 16:29, Trans wrote:I think we may want to change the package name from 'libxml-ruby' to just 'libxml'. The reason I suggest this is b/c, while it might suffice as is, it's confusing in light of platform gems. Ie. the "-ruby" looks like a platform specification. I know other gems use the "-ruby" suffix to indicate a pure ruby version of an otherwise compiled library. Thoughts? T. _______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list libxml-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel_______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list libxml-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list libxml-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
