On Jul 17, 12:15 pm, Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Something we didn't consider with the new LibXML namespace. > > We broke everyone's extensions. For instance, I was emailed this example: > > Comment out the following 4 lines and the test will pass (in 0.8.1). > class XML::Document > def a_methodname_very_unlikely_to_be_used_in_this_class arg > end > end > > Which of course doesn't work anymore, since it should be > LibXML::XML::Document.
No. That's not correct: >> module LibXML >> class XML >> end >> end => nil >> ?> include LibXML => Object >> class XML >> def q; "q"; end >> end => nil >> XML.new.q => "q" >> What's the problem? T. _______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list libxml-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
