On Jun 8, 6:39 pm, Dreamcat Four <dreamc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Trans <transf...@gmail.com> wrote: > > That setup really only makes sense if a project has multiple parts/ > > repos. At this point we have two libxml-ruby and libxmlr, and it's > > possible libxmlr may merge into libxml-ruby. Are there other extension > > I don't know about that could find a home in such an account. If so > > they ok. But if it's only these I don't think it's necessary. My 2c, > > A collaborators account can be valuable to make handover of > maintainership easier. So thats a reason that doesnt require more than > 2 repositories. > > And there are more than n=2 repositories, > > libxml-ruby > libxslt-ruby > libxml4r > gnome-libxml2 (git mirror) > > So, > Enough reasons to have a pool account ?
Oh yeah, libxslt-ruby! Works for me. _______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list libxml-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
