On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Massimo Zaniboni < massimo.zanib...@asterisell.com> wrote:
Probably I'm wrong, but I'm curious to understand where. So if someone has > the patience to read the post, can report here a fault part of my > reasoning, so I can understand better and maybe discuss? I added a comment to your post saying this: Your conclusions are incorrect because you are jumping to a single conclusion that is not justified. When the BSD/ISC/MIT licenses say that you must include the text of the license in derivative works, that's exactly what is meant: the words of the license must be provided as part of the documentation. It does not mean that they must be incorporated into the license of the derived work, which can be whatever you want.
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
